CNBC (GE) is definetely part of the Rothschild/Goldman gang

Read what pathetic bullshit is put up to read - not enough that complete incompetent people from Kudlow to Cramer still have the chance to speak publicly since they evidently have bullshitted people with their Goldilock talk into buying overpriced markets at the highs. Defending a Paulson who is an outrage as a secretary as he obviously worked always for Goldman and its an outrage that Obama does not have the guts to go after him because the second option that he is part of the gang would even be more devastating. That Bernanke and Paulson do use Mobster tactics in hearing and claim they can not recall the most crucial events in this century probably is an apparent proof of their guilt. The fact that no one in these government goes after them except for the fact that Summers will takeover Bernanke's post very soon but that's not what I meant to say. How can B/P (Bernanke / Paulson) make stock owners of BAC pay such a premium on Merrill as the CEO of Merrill was another Goldman at the same time - that stinks in anyway and the FBI should be allover these guys. That is everything a felony asks for some people loosed billions and we can be sure some made billions. So whatever the guy in the following letter writes is a piece of intellectual propaganda garbage or he is just brain dead.

Excerpt

By: Allen Wastler
Managing Editor, CNBC.com

Got more email than I expected from the post comparing Henry Paulson's congressional testimony last week to "A Few Good Men."There was plenty of pro-Paulson and anti-Paulson and frankly, a lot of people who take what was supposed to be a chuckle-post way too seriously.

But the best response was from Brian in Florida, who thought he heard Paulson say ...

Congressman, we live in a world that has markets, and those markets have to be guarded by men with brains. Who's gonna do it? You? You, Congressman Pander? I have a greater responsibility than you can possibly fathom. You weep for taxpayers, and you curse Wall Street. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know -- that the TARP, while tragic, probably saved money; and my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves jobs.

You don't want the truth because deep down in places you don't talk about at parties, you want me at that bank -- you need me at that bank.

We use words like "systemic risk," "contagion," "liquidity." We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punch line.

I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very prosperity that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.

I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up your voting button and legislate sensibly. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you're entitled to!